Jamie Golombek: One-year lag in pension adjustment calculations could cause confusion for taxpayers and result in RRSP contribution errors
Critiques and suggestions are unbiased and merchandise are independently chosen. Postmedia might earn an affiliate fee from purchases made via hyperlinks on this web page.
Article content material
To assist save for retirement, Canadians are inspired to contribute to a registered retirement financial savings plan (RRSP) every year. The quantity you may contribute is predicated on 18 per cent of the prior yr’s earned earnings, as much as an annual most. For 2024, that annual most is $31,560. Earned earnings consists of employment earnings, self-employment earnings, and rental earnings.
Commercial 2
Article content material
Taxpayers who take part of their employer’s registered pension plan (RPP), whether or not or not it’s an outlined profit or outlined contribution (DC) plan, might discover their RRSP contributions restricted by one thing referred to as a “pension adjustment,” or PA. The PA represents the worth of the pension credit you’ve earned on account of your employer making contributions in your behalf to a pension plan. The aim of the PA is to forestall double-dipping of tax deductible pension contributions; as your employer contributes to a pension plan in your behalf, the quantity you may then contribute to an RRSP is lowered accordingly.
The PA is reported in your T4 slip every year, and can scale back your RRSP contribution restrict for the next yr. For instance, the 2023 T4 slip you obtained out of your employer in February 2024 would have reported your 2023 employment earnings, alongside together with your PA from 2023, which reduces your 2024 RRSP contribution room. You may see the PA taken under consideration in your RRSP deduction restrict and out there contribution assertion that kinds a part of your annual discover of evaluation.
High Tales
Article content material
Commercial 3
Article content material
The calculation of the PA, which is completed by the employer, and the one-year lag, can typically trigger confusion for taxpayers and result in RRSP contribution errors.
Take the current case of an Ontario taxpayer, determined in late October, who went to Tax Courtroom earlier this yr to problem an evaluation he obtained from the Canada Income Company which disallowed the deduction of $25,362 that he contributed to his RRSP for the 2021 taxation yr. The CRA solely allowed a deduction of $12,175.
All through the 2020 taxation yr, the taxpayer labored for TSX Inc. He had been employed there since 2001, and was a member of its registered pension plan, which was an outlined contribution plan. In March 2021, the taxpayer left the TSX, terminating his membership within the employer’s pension plan.
The difficulty on trial was how a lot the taxpayer was entitled to deduct for 2021. The decide, earlier than rendering his determination on the matter, reviewed the aim of an RPP, which is for an employer to supply periodic funds to people after retirement for his or her service as staff. In easy phrases, an outlined contribution pension plan, such because the plan on the TSX, is one by which contributions made by the employer are credited to every member.
Commercial 4
Article content material
Consequently, TSX staff who had been members of the plan have a pension credit score reported to them every year, the credit score being the profit the member earned below the RPP in the course of the calendar yr. A member’s PA is just the overall of their pension credit from an RPP of which they had been a member in the course of the yr, and that PA reduces that member’s RRSP contribution restrict within the following yr.
For the 2020 tax yr, the taxpayer earned pension credit of $16,692, which was the quantity mirrored on his 2020 T4 slip as his PA for that yr. For 2021, his pension credit had been $3,505, which had been reported as a PA on his 2021 T4 slip.
The decide went on to elucidate that in sure conditions, a taxpayer’s RRSP deduction restrict may be elevated, after having been lowered by an earlier PA that had lowered their deduction restrict, by pension credit that had been later forfeited. In such a state of affairs, a pension adjustment reversal (“PAR”) could be issued to the taxpayer once they ceased to be a member of the pension plan. For a DC plan, the PAR is proscribed to the quantity of employer contributions to which the person is just not entitled when their membership within the RPP ends. In different phrases, the PAR is the quantity of employer contributions that stay unvested on the time their membership within the pension plan is terminated.
Commercial 5
Article content material
Within the current case, nonetheless, no PAR was issued to the taxpayer for the easy cause that every one pension credit as much as the date he terminated his membership within the TSX plan in March 2021 had been totally vested.
The taxpayer tried to current a “novel” idea which he referred to as a “previsioned” or “anticipated PA.” Below the taxpayer’s concept, the quantity he ought to have been in a position to deduct as an RRSP contribution in 2021 begins along with his 2021 RRSP deduction restrict of $12,175 (his precise 2021 restrict), however ought to then be supplemented by the distinction between his “anticipated” 2021 PA of $16,692 (being equal to his PA in 2020) and his precise 2021 PA of $3,505, as reported on his 2021 T4 slip.
Beneficial from Editorial
Sadly, this argument didn’t go muster with the decide, who nonetheless referred to as the taxpayer’s concept “remarkably artistic,” however discovered that it had no foundation within the regulation. The closest factor the decide may discover to the taxpayer’s place was the PAR, however for the reason that taxpayer was totally vested when he terminated his membership within the TSX pension plan, he was not entitled to any PAR when he left the plan.
Commercial 6
Article content material
Consequently, the decide discovered that the taxpayer was solely entitled to deduct $12,175 as an RRSP contribution for 2021, which was his 2021 RRSP restrict, as initially assessed by the CRA. The taxpayer’s enchantment was accordingly dismissed.
Jamie Golombek, FCPA, FCA, CFP, CLU, TEP, is the managing director, Tax & Property Planning with CIBC Non-public Wealth in Toronto. [email protected].
If you happen to preferred this story, join extra within the FP Investor e-newsletter.
Bookmark our web site and help our journalism: Don’t miss the enterprise information it is advisable to know — add financialpost.com to your bookmarks and join our newsletters right here.
Article content material
